The Scrap and Margaret Thatcher

One element of Black Swan Green that I found particularly interesting was the evolving political views of Jason, especially Julia’s influence on them. I started tracking this particular thread of the novel, making note of every time Margaret Thatcher is mentioned. The chapter “Rocks” was especially insightful, as Jason started the chapter saying things like, “The Daily Mail’s dead right,” “Mrs. Thatcher’s bloody ace,” and talking about “Loony Lefters” (Mitchell 101). By the end, he’s talking about the reports the Guardian made about the lasting damage of the Falklands War. 

But this is not the first time he questions his beliefs. One moment that stood out to me was when he questions Thatcher’s words in “Bridal Path.” There are two important pieces of context for this moment—the scrap between Grant Burch and Ross Wilcox, and Tom Yew’s nightmare. I will mostly focus on the scrap (or at least try to). One way of looking at the scrap, which was brought up during class, is as a violent act that brought both parties down, as they fall down the embankment. The violence disturbs and scares Jason. He narrates every single move in a play-by-play, but rather than feeling any excitement, “[his] own body flinched under the punches, automatically” (Mitchell 75). Their violence leads them to the edge of the embankment, and they both fall down. Burch ends up with a broken wrist, and despite what could be considered a win for Wilcox, Philip Phelps stays as Burch’s servant. His win doesn’t win him that much.

Later in the day, Jason witnesses Tom Yew waking up from his nightmare about fighting in the navy. Following this moment, three jets fly overhead, and Jason ponders the inevitable future of war, saying that bombs will be dropped on “English cities, towns, and villages like Worcester, Malvern, and Black Swan Green.” Notably, he follows this by listing “Dresden, the Blitz, and Nagasaki”—all sites of bombings during WWII on all sides of the conflict (Mitchell 91). The three English towns are mirrors of the three bombings of WWII—Jason doesn’t see them as people on the other side that deserved it, but as “people like us” whose homes were obliterated (Mitchell 91).

He then follows this up by quoting Thatcher’s words about Cruise Missiles. He recalls her saying, “‘The only way to stop a playground bully … is to show the bully that if he thumps you, then you can jolly well thump him back a lot harder!’” Jason then thinks, “But the threat of being thumped back never stopped Ross Wilcox and Grant Burch scrapping, did it?” (Mitchell 91). Therein lies the connection between the scrap and Jason’s views—he questions Thatcher’s words because their scrap showed that her logic doesn’t always work. Grant Burch was the toughest guy in the third year, but that didn’t stop Wilcox from fighting him—and falling. The risk of being hurt didn’t stop Burch from initiating the scrap in the first place, and he ends up with a broken wrist because of it. (Ultimately, the rivalry between the two ends up with Wilcox losing part of his leg, bringing him down further despite his earlier win, but that’s too off topic for me to pursue further).

This is the same as Jason’s upcoming views in “Rocks” about war, and pyrrhic victories. He doesn’t believe that the violence between Wilcox and Burch was worth it, and it bring them both down. He doesn’t believe that the violence of war is worth it, when any deterrent can be ignored, like how Wilcox and Burch ignore the risks of the scrap. He believes that war hurts innocent people, like Tom Yew—both with his nightmare and his actual death later in the novel—and the people of Dresden and Nagasaki. And, importantly, he doesn’t believe in Margaret Thatcher’s words.

Comments

  1. Hi Lana!
    “The only way to stop a playground bully … is to show the bully that if he thumps you, then you can jolly well thump him back a lot harder!" literally Norman Bates at the end of Ch 9. This recontextualized Thatcher as being completely out of touch with reality and actual bullying. In the book, Jason confronts Ross Wilcox by turning the other cheek. Ross Wilcox then almost self-destructs (accidentally, which is better than falling in the Seine). Jason does initially use "violent" retribution against Neal Brose in Ch12, but the thing that actually stops Brose from continuing his extortion racket is when Jason tells the teachers, who then intervene, about it.
    It's also interesting that you bring up Philip Phelps and Grant Burch: if we were to connect this to the Falkland War, it would be logical that he would be the Falklands?
    Interestingly, by the end of the book Phelps does rebel against Burch, likely being inspired by Jason and the other "lepers" ending Brose's reign. This again shows that violence is not the way to end oppression, and instead we should use kindness and diplomacy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'd say there is definitely some satirical political content in the way that David Mitchell has naive Jason Taylor essentially equate Thatcher with a schoolyard bully, even as she gaslights everyone into thinking that Britain is somehow responding to Argentina's "bullying" (in the form of claiming land off their own coast that is somehow a "colony" of a country thousands of miles away in a different hemisphere). And also, indeed, in the ways that Jason's views are clearly not his own but have been influenced by right-wing media and pro-war propaganda. It's almost funny, but also tragic, how Jason admires Thatcher's verbal dexterity and power so openly: her assertions might be dubious, her statements of power verbal bluster, just as the "victory" in the war doesn't run very deep. But Jason imagines himself armed with Thatcherian verbal power putting that pesky Ross Wilcox in his place. That is, until the shine wears off the exciting TV-show war and he realizes that Thatcher's take on bullies is not necessarily accurate or reliable.

    As usual, Julia is the one who points him in a more constructive direction, and in the end, her verbal dexterity is a better role model than Thatcher's. Julia doesn't celebrate pyrrhic victories.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oooh I loved this connection! I do think some of the themes in this book evade me at times--- I never realized that David Mitchell was equating the Falklands War with Wilcox and Burch's scrap, but looking back, that was probably meant to be very obvious. It's even more interesting when you realize how much of a pyrrhic victory the scrap ended up being for Wilcox: he lost the motorcycle that was only available because Tom Yew died in the war, he lost his girlfriend to the very boy he had the scrap with, and he also ends up losing an entire portion of his leg. In the end, Jason doesn't use violence to stand up against his bullies explicitly, but he does realize that you can "thump [your bully] back a lot harder", through the punishment he's able to inflict-- he's no longer afraid that his own bullies will retaliate, because it's clear that shows of strength would never maintain lasting peace, in the examples of the war and in Wilcox and Burch's relationship.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I definitely kept Jason's political views in mind while reading BSG. I agree that its very meaningful when he disagree's with Thatchers words, and that hitting back harder isn't always the best solution. I think this in general is a theme we see a lot, like defending yourself and getting even, and the Spooks. I think it shows a lot of Jason's personal improvement that he questions violence as the answer, something he always believed. Ultimately this leads him to being the bigger person, later returning Ross' wallet to him. While keeping the wallet could've injured him, maybe even involving him in the accident of Ross, he chooses to be the bigger person and possibly avoids a fate with violence, effectively breaking that cycle.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Lana! Of the many different elements in this book, I agree that his shifting political views are certainly really interesting, and I like the connection you made between the war and the scrap between Wilcox and Burch. The shift of him being really into the war and not really putting in much thought about the violence within it, to being really aware of the violence and having pretty opposite views was really compelling. And, it helps him come to the realization that violence doesn't always make you the bigger person, making his return of the wallet more important. Great post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment